Well the "scripture" in Principia Discordia were meant to broaden the mind, not to have a full literal meaning. Just like the Zen teachings, koans...
anyway if we want to be challenged by your question, and try to answer, then I guess, we'd have to point to some sentences that make the recipient say "well yes... and no".
Sentences that can be subjectively interpreted both ways, by different people, or by us, being able to look at the thing from two perspectives, etc.
Like "religion is helpful"
- true: yes. it provides comfort to folks. undereducated folks can have the nice feeling of them understanding everything... (well, god did it, god wanted it... even if the term "god" is so abstract, and it relates to nothing. just an imaginary concept)
- false. it isn't. it blocks the way for proper knowledge, it shows the world not in it's true form, it brings/brought about wars, stupid bigots etc. bla bla bla etc.
Now there might come 2-3 pms right now supporting my point of view. 5-6 which doesn't. But is my point of view true? false? to some extend true and to some - false?
How can a point of view be true or false? and if we have people thinking both ways, then can we take it as your answer? that some sentences can be considered both true and false?
Besides, if you want a less subjective sentences examples that would use such a paradox, then just google "liar sentences" or something like that...
Or MAYBE just cut yourself...
It will be easier...
Still, I think, that the author just meant sentences that can be interpreted both ways, or that are to some extend true to some not, or one part of a long sentence is true, the other false, etc.
...
I changed my mind.
DEFINITELLY cut yourself... for bringing me to blabber such an abstract nonsense ;P!
Last edited by Sahee; Jan 4, 2010 at 12:51 PM.