Originally Posted by
cocacobra
Oracle im going to make a montage for you.
I main fizz and hes one of the best mids. His ultimate definately wins his lane because they become afraid and let you farm after you assasinate them with it.
Make me a list of things you want me to prove a fizz can do. Like initiating with his ult, winning mid before level 6 (can easily kill mid by level 3) and after completely destroying them they play alot closer to the tower
I can make a montage of any champion too, doesn't mean that champion is good for the role I showed, nor that champion necessarily being good at all. The point of a montage is to showcase highlights, not actual gameplay. What makes a champion a good mid is consistent, keyword CONSISTENT, good laning. To do that, the champion needs to be capable of fighting every possible, or nearly every possible, mid, particularly the most played ones, without getting bullied. And fizz cannot do that. And you cannot demonstrate it through a montage.
And people seem to be ignoring that I've said it before, I PLAY FIZZ, I KNOW HOW FIZZ PLAYS. Translation: I don't need you showing me a video about using E to avoid projectiles, using q effectively from behind a minion line to harass a champion, standard fizz burst combos, and general fizz play. I can safely say I've done it before, I've done it consistently, and I still know that despite that, he's still not a good mid pick. I have earned easy triples, quadras, and a penta with fizz, I know his mechanics well enough, and I know as a champion he's a very strong pick, but not for mid. And the only reasons for that is he can't lane as effectively against a range as he can against a melee, and he lanes significantly worse if the enemy has any form of cc, both of which all or most mids have.