Originally Posted by
Icky
2) I have this DM from Fire, ![](https://i.imgur.com/UxNQElA.png)
This leads me to believe that there was another TK match with a ping that wasn't counted. Since Fires' DM specifically says that that ping happened on the 2nd turn, while the match conceded has specifically stated the ping occurred after the 3rd turn.
No this is the same one -_-
Now you are just playing dumb to explain yourself thats fucked up
-----
Originally Posted by icky
1) The previous ping in a TK match : iRuukie vs Diamond: iRuukie wins 14-11 (Diamond pinged after turn 3)
This shows that there was certainly some self governed decision making by the clans, and that alpha conceded the match and the point due to Diamond pinging.
No. we just went on with the games so we don't cause any delay, but me and Divine talked about if we should count it or not, and then he told me to contact you. therefore, there was no "self governed decision, there was me dm'ing you but not getting any actual response, help or explanation.
Pics about the chat between me and Divine, deciding that we won't make the call ourselfs, but ASK YOU:
https://gyazo.com/33bdd0c9bd643e3319d8a6f3490254da
https://gyazo.com/596aa78157da3d976c91f80e12089953
Originally Posted by icky
2) I have this DM from Fire,
This leads me to believe that there was another TK match with a ping that wasn't counted. Since Fires' DM specifically says that that ping happened on the 2nd turn, while the match conceded has specifically stated the ping occurred after the 3rd turn.
So you are "assuming" that? why didn't you have direct contact with asking for explanation, or even divine?
why not look at facts, at live streak, at fucking replays? Did you even bother asking for them?
I said it was turn 2 as if 2 spaces had already happened, it was a misunderstanding that you took analysed your own way, without any fact proofing it.
In such case, I could potentially say that this was a lack of responsibility by our side, as 1) you didnt answer me explaining whether it's a loss or not, and 2) you just used your vague explanation rather that facts.
Originally Posted by icky
3) Conceding pings as equal to a match lost has long been a staple of clan wars, as well as other forms of 1 on 1 events. I have no actual reason to look at a ping in a tiebreaker any differently. It's unfortunate for it to happen, but it is still a factor of the game and needs to be considered as something players accept as a possibility.
yes you do, you have many.
1- this being Clan league, all being about witch is the strongest clan of the year, not the luckiest one.
2- I had technically already won that game, there was no move he could have pulled that would have made me lose that match.
3- The ping being most likely cause by outside forces:
a) toribash servers being trash exposing anyone to a potential ping.
b) outside force, as the server was FULL, and being constantly spammed nonstop, where some players had the ACTUAL intention of making me ping (by that i am referring the the leaked picture I sent you from [w] private board.
So yea, do you think you still have no actual reason to look at the tiebreaker in a different way?
Originally Posted by icky
4) I cannot overturn this ping, without overturning other pings that have occurred prior, one being obviously linked in this clan league match with diamond, but there were others that occurred. I cannot in good conscience recount one or both of those pings without also recounting pings that other clans have had losses from.
I would like to remind you that before CL started, we (the community) voted that every situation will be looked into consideration depending on the current situation. therefore, if other pings are also worth of not counting, then it it your job to not count them.
Last edited by Fire; Aug 7, 2019 at 09:25 AM.
Reason: <24 hour edit/bump