Originally Posted by azzeffir23

SG accurate? More accurate than AK? Hahaha dafuq you talking about mate the SG is the most unaccurate weapon in CS:GO you have to letarly shoot 1 bullet- 1 bullet to get some damage or kill on someone with that gun.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

So I lost ~200 fps in the last patch, time to stop playing till it's fixed lol...


That's not true at all. SG is a lot more accurate than AK, and it has less spread, and it has zoom. How can you really say that lol?

The disadvantage of SG: it costs $300 more than AK, in some situations it takes 1 more hit to kill an armoured enemy (rare, but it can happen), 12% slower reload time (again, rarely going to matter, but it could), 2% slower move speed ( ok super rarely this might have some kind of effect?!?! )

The advantages of SG: Much more accurate than the ak (second most accurate crouching accuracy, and 4th most accurate standing) plus it has a scope, less recoil too, more damage than AK against armoured, fires faster.

It's not usually worth $300 for what is basically just a more accurate, faster firing, higher damage AK, that's why it's not purchased. Just learn AK and M4A1-S is much easier than learning other spray patterns, so that's what people do. But there is absolutely no doubt in anyone's mind that SG is a better gun than the AK, but it's just pointless that's all. Like imagine if there was an AWP V2 that cost 5250 that was more 5x more accurate, fired 12% faster, hit 10% harder, and could zoom in one more level? It's pointless right? That's the situation as it is with the AK vs SG. The gap isn't big enough to really make a difference.

I'm sure there's a lot of good people out there who really abuse the scope and accuracy though, maybe think of it as a lower damage dakdak.