Toribash
A 1.0 w/l ratio means you have 1 win for every 1 loss.

It's wins divided by losses.

A .8 could be 8 wins/10 losses, 16 wins/20 losses etc etc


Christ
Originally Posted by Megadoomer View Post
A 1.0 w/l ratio means you have 1 win for every 1 loss.

It's wins divided by losses.

A .8 could be 8 wins/10 losses, 16 wins/20 losses etc etc


Christ

1.0 w/l ratio means, you have 1 win, for every 0 loss. (1:0). You are thinking of a 1:1 ratio, 1 win for 1 loss.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Love you guys. | Soɐd | Kiza | iRookie | Orko | TGS |
Zora | ViperTech

Originally Posted by Nyann View Post
1.0 w/l ratio means, you have 1 win, for every 0 loss. (1:0). You are thinking of a 1:1 ratio, 1 win for 1 loss.

You can't divide by 0. Christ you are dumb.

It's not based on total games played, it's based on Wins/Losses


(Hint: The blackslash (/) means divided by, even in the Name W/L ratio)


(!!!)
Lol honestly, get some math lessons.



On the other hand, are the lolbase stats updated? I've got a feeling they're at least a bit outdated and I'm not sure if we should really take them into consideration that much.


btw. when talking about tristana's low w/l ratio, it's probably because of her being free on facebook. Free champion = newbs play it = they fail miserably.

And to be honest I've considered tristana utter shit until I've reached 30th lvl, it was the cap for tristana even starting to be any useful.

@down
you make no sense at all.
Last edited by JtanK; Jul 3, 2011 at 12:03 AM.

[re] | #Polska
qui hic minxerit aut cacaverit, habeat deos superos et inferos iratos
I know, you cannot divide by 0. G.G.

But you think, that 1.0 = 1 win for 1 loss. That is wrong.
Thats 1 win. Over 0 losses.
WIN : LOSS
1 : 0

Where as 1:1 = 1 Win for a loss.
WIN : LOSS
1 : 1

Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Love you guys. | Soɐd | Kiza | iRookie | Orko | TGS |
Zora | ViperTech

Originally Posted by JtanK View Post
Lol honestly, get some math lessons.



On the other hand, are the lolbase stats updated? I've got a feeling they're at least a bit outdated and I'm not sure if we should really take them into consideration that much.


btw. when talking about tristana's low w/l ratio, it's probably because of her being free on facebook. Free champion = newbs play it = they fail miserably.

And to be honest I've considered tristana utter shit until I've reached 30th lvl, it was the cap for tristana even starting to be any useful.

I was thinking about that, because I am confused as to how Corki has such a low W/L ratio, but it's a possibility

Originally Posted by Nyann View Post
I know, you cannot divide by 0. G.G.

But you think, that 1.0 = 1 win for 1 loss. That is wrong.
Thats 1 win. Over 0 losses.
WIN : LOSS
1 : 0

Where as 1:1 = 1 Win for a loss.
WIN : LOSS
1 : 1

Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones

Think about it like this.
Using the math WE provide, you CAN go over 1.0 WL ratio (I.E. Why warwick has a 1.2 W/L ratio)

Using YOUR math; however, we cannot. You cannot explain why warwick has a 1.2 W/L ratio, but we can.
T0ribush: I could not get into two worlds even if my life depended on it.
ಠ_ಠ ಥ_ಥ
Since you are so dumb, I'm going to assume you play Call of Duty (lololo)

Let's chance the Win/loss ratio to a kill/death ratio.

Let's say your K/D is 2.0 (and most FPS players have K/D ratios greater than 1.0, which disproves your theory)

Now what does that mean? That means you have 2 kills for every death. (2 divided by 1 == 2)

You think that it's a percentage directly related to the amount of games played. It's not. I see where you are coming from in the 1 - 0 business, but you simply cant have a ratio from 1 game, because you cant divide by 0. The point is, you're wrong on many levels and I really hope to never play a league of legends match with you ever


And if you are right (which you arent). Explain to me WW's w/l ratio of 1.2
Last edited by Megadoomer; Jul 3, 2011 at 12:07 AM.
LoL...I suck at it. I always die...it's frustrating, yet addicting.
Toriprime/VIP local moderator | Colon 3 | 4th dan
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
<3 Cide | Glow | Jarmund | ishi | satiknee | Wiggi | Fish | pal <3
[19:12] <&MrManiac> I kept pooping in my pants
Alright. Maybe I lost this one. But i'm going to blame it on the fact. That, Ratios are normaly measured with the : symbol. Not 1.0...etc.

So, yeah. You win this one, I guess.

------------------

But honestly, keep the flaming down. Not once did I call names into this argument, yet you "have" to. So, continue being a keyboard warrior, over an argument.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Love you guys. | Soɐd | Kiza | iRookie | Orko | TGS |
Zora | ViperTech

Even if it was with the : symbol.

Lets say you have 1 win and 2 losses.

That's 1 : 2 yes?

That's also 1/2. And 1 divided by 2 is .5

You have a .5 w/l ratio. Fractions are fun