Toribash
I am actually quite healthy, I will be on tomorrow around 4:00, little brother permitting.
goodbye cruel world
Zeto I would like to counter, I still say yes to Bowler but that's dishonestly through absence of details. Which is not nice, cause prior bans influence a vote in my opinion.
<BISH> kick chan my modes are moving on their own~
<Shook> FLAGGOTS
ofcourse bans influence votes, but the fact that 2 people voted no JUST for the fact that he's been banned before is dumb because we don't even know what it was that bowl posted nor how bowl reacted towards that

and i haven't seen anything in the likes of pornographic posts by bowl anywhere which makes the ban mean close to nothing in my eyes

EDIT: to clarify what i mean: aslong as we aren't affected by bowl's history it shouldn't sway our members votes.
'u'
neutral to bowler for now, talked to him a bit ingame but i wanna hang with him in irc etc


[T]
#hi


I can actually c/p every post from my repeal thread if you want. I'm not opposed.
goodbye cruel world
I was on earlier, but cannot again today and about half of tomorrow due to Easter
goodbye cruel world
I say no to BowlerHats. (unless I can be convinced ingame or irc)

I've seen this type one too many times, and I feel he won't have much to bring to this clan from what I can see. I hate judging off of "good" apps and first impressions though. I feel it just doesn't hold any weight in my acceptance decisions. So for now I will give a no, until I can get to know him more over time and properly gauge his aptitude.
DAMN.