The idea isn't THAT bad.
As daniel said,that might help us in clan wars.

Not only that but if members at the bottom of the ladder realise that they need to be higher up to participate they will be motivated to improve so that they do get to participate.

Fuck, when the fuck did darian grow a pair. I'm really amused.
Also, I voted yes.

That leads to another problem, being exclusion. But due to the major difference in gmt, I dont think its going to matter much.


It's called serious trololol.



Also the tediousness I speak of? In order to create this chart accurately, each person would have to fight every other player 5 times. Assuming there are 20 people, that would be 20+19+18+17......3+2+1 times 5 times another 7 official mods. That's 7,350 games in total, divided by 20, that's 368 games each person :/ tedious?

Maybe make a list of everyone's preferred mod? Will make it easyier to know who plays what.

Your math is flawed. People will play 5-10 games a week depending on how many times we allow people to challenge each other per week. And not everyine has to plat everyone. I was thinking in the beggining we could introduce a mock ladder, basically just randomly throw people in there, or make one on how the clan members or leader sees their ingame ability. Then once or twice a week you can challenge a player 2 or 3 positions above you. And thats it for you. Then next week you do it again. so about 40 games a month max. Doesn't sound very tedious now does it?

That heavily diminishes the accuracy of this test.

Well the ladder wasn't meant to be accurate. But it gives an indication, and promotes some competition.

I think that if we gona change something we should only keep SyN invite only !
But invite only goods, also close recruitment for a while is ok xD

No... But we only recruit very good/active people...