View Poll Results: What is your religion?
Christianity
63 Votes / 35.80%
Islam
16 Votes / 9.09%
Hinduism
1 Votes / 0.57%
Buddhism
3 Votes / 1.70%
Taoism
3 Votes / 1.70%
Other
2 Votes / 1.14%
Judaism
4 Votes / 2.27%
No religion - Atheism
48 Votes / 27.27%
No religion - Agnosticism or similar
27 Votes / 15.34%
I don't know.
9 Votes / 5.11%
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll
View Poll Results
View Poll Results
Originally Posted by Wook
I met people similar to you and they won't make me Atheist or something. What about miracles? Yeah, you'll have hundreds of "rational" explanations.
What miracles? If you want to bring up certain points you need to be more specific.
I also am not claiming that there is no transcendence or something like that.
I am just saying that I am going to assume there is none until it's proven otherwise.
I am no atheist. I am agnostic. Ignostic even.
How are you?
I willing to bet that 50% percent of the Christians up there havn't even fully read the Bible yet, If you can't even read the rulebook/story behind your beleifs why beleive them?
Atheism.
Atheism.
- > - > ORMO | 7th dan < - < -
<Muse> hush little kronos, dont you cry, Muse is gonna sing you a lullaby
<Muse> hush little kronos, dont you cry, Muse is gonna sing you a lullaby
Originally Posted by Redundant
It is impossible to prove something does not exist.
Originally Posted by psycore
wrong. I can prove that an intersection point of two parallels doesn't exist.
Originally Posted by Redundant
Non-existant things are non-existant...
No way!
Originally Posted by Redundant
...which means there are no things that do not exists.
What? Dude, seriously. Of course there are things that don't exist.
Originally Posted by Redundant
That means you cannot prove the non-existance of something.
see above.
Originally Posted by Redundant
Saying ‘prove that god does not exist’ is like saying ‘prove to me I am not thinking of your mum being nude’.
Impossible.
This is true but for other reasons. You just can't prove metaphysics with laws of physics and logic. Try to prove things without those.
Originally Posted by Redundant
Also: The burden of proof is on your side as you are the one claiming it to exist.
As long as you do not prove the existance of the allmighty master I am going to assume he is non-existant.
You could try to prove he doesn't exist.
Originally Posted by Redundant
I am just saying that I am going to assume there is none until it's proven otherwise.
Originally Posted by psycore
Missing proof for something doesn't prove it's opposite.
Originally Posted by Redundant
I am no atheist. I am agnostic. Ignostic even.
Agnostics neither say that God exists nor that he doesn't because they are not possible to prove one of it. You clearly say there is no God, what makes you an atheist.
Sorry for the long post.
Signature temporarily out of order.
