Believing in nothing = atheism
Actually that is nihilism. Atheism is believing in no God.
Any logical person would conclude that there is no God as there is no hard evidence.
Wrong. Missing proof for something doesn't prove it's opposite. Just look at your argument from the other side. There is no hard evidence God doesn't exist so he has to exist. Wait, what?
There isn't something to show of something that doesn't exist because it doesnt' exist
Also wrong. I can prove that an intersection point of two parallels doesn't exist.
It just doesn't seem right how we just kind of "came to be" I mean, what's the point in that?
So God created everything. But who created God? Right, he just came to be.
Or he has been there since forever. But that's not much more reasonable than just beginning to exist. Also there is a theroy which says the universe is existing since forever.
Still it's hard to believe live is an accident.
Still I don't think any Gods I read about exist in the way they are described. There always are contradictions. Well, maybe the invisible pink unicorn and the flying spaghetti monster do exist...
In case you didn't notice, I'm an agnostic. Not because I'm to stupid to find an answer but because it is impossible imo. It will never be possible to (dis)prove God. Still he might exist. There may be no need for a God in our world (technically; maybe the univers runs on it's own). But there is neither a logical explanation nor the need for the duckbill, still it exists.
Last edited by psycore; Apr 12, 2011 at 05:04 PM.
Reason: forgot something