The Staff members do full background checks on you during the application process, and so yes it will be considered, however if your application is strong enough, and your history isn't too outrageously bad, you can still get the position.
There is also an aspect of time intervals. What I mean by this is, if you apply with a large gap in between application, your history is still considered, but with more concern of your current integrity, to that of your past.
Originally Posted by
Kyure
In general, the staff do not simply reject people for having a history of rule breaking, but will reject those who still break rules. The same standard applies to other reasons people are denied, having a poor history of activity generally isn't a reason that users are denied (though it can be)*, but being consistently inactive and not showing any commitment is a definite reason for rejection. An understanding of the rules is necessary for all staff, but don't expect to have to know the ins and outs of every single rule when becoming a staff member, common sense is a greater tool than simply knowing every written rule.
Last edited by Bless; Feb 16, 2017 at 11:22 AM.