Toribash
Well, aren't we a bunch of Grammar Nazis?

(Ten brownie points to the Grammar Nazi who points out the error. <3)

I NEED NO BROWNIE POINTS.
Last edited by supahninja; Dec 13, 2011 at 04:17 AM.
zuɐɹpʞɹɐp ʇɔǝdxǝ | [ριïαâôz] | [εssεηcε]
Originally Posted by rappunk23 View Post
Well, are we not a bunch of Grammar Nazis?

(Ten brownie points to the Grammar Nazi who points out the error. <3)

english is my secondary, but isn't this correct?
Supahninja corrected it.
It was "Well, aren't we a bunch of Grammar Nazi's?"
It should be (like it is now), "Well, aren't we a bunch of Grammar Nazis?"

^0^
zuɐɹpʞɹɐp ʇɔǝdxǝ | [ριïαâôz] | [εssεηcε]
Originally Posted by Slaugther View Post
Next challenge kgo.

Pro-Challenge: Correct all grammatical errors in Pundzo's posts. <3
zuɐɹpʞɹɐp ʇɔǝdxǝ | [ριïαâôz] | [εssεηcε]
Hey that's not nice, so you get a 10.01/10 in the user rating thread.
Last edited by rappunk23; Dec 14, 2011 at 01:58 PM. Reason: Fix'd
Haha, rappunk I love you! That's amazing. :P

Edit: But there is a grammatical error in your post. It's apost to be, "Pundzos' not Pundzo's." When you say "Pundzo's" you're basicly saying, "in Pundzo is posts. <3"

It's about to be "in Pundzos' posts. <3" because it gives him ownership of HIS post.
-----
btw

http://gyazo.com/270faadaf408425527f61b1d37db331e
-----
http://gyazo.com/17685234d52ef034f17bbb301f591e22
Last edited by Donut; Dec 14, 2011 at 08:47 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Pickled is alright
And fresh is quite a delight
Creati0n-approved
No, because the apostrophe 's' on the end is possessive. If there was more than one Pundzo, then is would be "Pundzos'". There is only one Pundzo, and there is no 's' on the end of his name, so it is "Pundzo's".


<3
Last edited by supahninja; Dec 15, 2011 at 09:14 PM. Reason: <3
zuɐɹpʞɹɐp ʇɔǝdxǝ | [ριïαâôz] | [εssεηcε]