Originally Posted by
Redundant
It is impossible to prove something does not exist.
Originally Posted by
psycore
wrong. I can prove that an intersection point of two parallels doesn't exist.
Originally Posted by
Redundant
Non-existant things are non-existant...
No way!
Originally Posted by
Redundant
...which means there are no things that do not exists.
What? Dude, seriously. Of course there are things that don't exist.
Originally Posted by
Redundant
That means you cannot prove the non-existance of something.
see above.
Originally Posted by
Redundant
Saying ‘prove that god does not exist’ is like saying ‘prove to me I am not thinking of your mum being nude’.
Impossible.
This is true but for other reasons. You just can't prove metaphysics with laws of physics and logic. Try to prove things without those.
Originally Posted by
Redundant
Also: The burden of proof is on your side as you are the one claiming it to exist.
As long as you do not prove the existance of the allmighty master I am going to assume he is non-existant.
You could try to prove he doesn't exist.
Originally Posted by
Redundant
I am just saying that I am going to assume there is none until it's proven otherwise.
Originally Posted by
psycore
Missing proof for something doesn't prove it's opposite.
Originally Posted by
Redundant
I am no atheist. I am agnostic. Ignostic even.
Agnostics neither say that God exists nor that he doesn't because they are not possible to prove one of it. You clearly say there is no God, what makes you an atheist.
Sorry for the long post.