The bolded statement is actually irrelevant. I won't go into details, but Vox's ban has at the most nothing more than a coincidental relationship with yours.

Also, you shouldn't disregard Fish's post just because "he had nothing to do with your ban". If you want us to dig into the semantics of a ban from that long ago, we'll end up having to do some guesswork, but we'd probably come to exactly the same conclusion that Fish has already posted.