A couple things that could use rewording or more explaining.

Number 1: Maybe assign more definite powers to each to make it more clear cut on where the powers of one end and the powers of another begin.

Number 4: So everyone votes but they're not really making the decision since the council makes the decision? Or do you mean, the new applicants are decided by the council but everyone in the org gets to voice their concerns or comments about others joining?

Number 5: In personal conflicts, what exactly happens to the persons involved with said conflict? To me it doesn't seem like there's much anyone could do in a personal conflict situation other than be a 3rd party voice or some kind of mediator in a discussion.

Number 8: Seems like it can be a loophole for Number 2. If the leader doesn't like a guy he can just 'infract' him until there's a ban from the org. Maybe add something about infraction appeals that would go before the council if the infraction was believe to be wrongly earned.

It also has nothing about a democratic change in the leader or council.